It's a great idea, and god knows I'm no fan of GW, but I think some of the positions articulated are a little on the unfair side. I'm thinking particularly of the position on steel tariffs. The situation is not - as was suggested - that he imposed steel tariffs in a positive move and then betrayed them (ie. it's not the second part that's the bad thing), it's that he imposed steel tariffs IN DEFIANCE OF TREATIES ABOUT WORLD TRADE, and the EU appealed to the WTO for permission to respond by imposing duties on US goods in return. This permission was basically forthcoming because these were the agreements that the various countries had proposed, and because Bush proposed an arrangement that (typically) attempted to shore up his reputation at home by breaking international agreements/laws etc. If the rest of the world had instituted tariffs against US products then they'd be subject to the same censures.